This article contains information for adults about sex and genitals.
Last year, three left-wing nonprofits created the National Sex Education Standards, a model for âsex educationâ for children from kindergarten to grade 12. In practice, the standards serve as an indoctrination camp for extremist sexual ethics designed to destroy children’s innocence and undermine their attachment to the traditional Judeo-Christian understanding of sex and marriage.
According to the Centers of Disease Control in a 2016 report, about 40 percent of school districts had adopted the previous, less extreme version of national sex education standards. The new standards are radically more extreme.
The 2020 standards unequivocally endorse abortion at all times, teach the subject as early as sixth grade, and even require teachers to provide information about local abortion clinics to ninth grade students. The standards also insist that children should be allowed to choose their own sex and that false pronouns should âbe respected by the adults in their livesâ.
Kindergarten children learn gender identity and third grade students learn that gender is on a spectrum, about “the role of hormone blockers” for transgender youth and how to “explain” masturbation. Sixth grade students – ages eleven and twelve – are to define oral, anal and vaginal sex as well as the benefits of removing your penis before ejaculation during sex and how to use dental dams during oral sex.
New even more disturbed standards
The 2020 version is different from the 2011 version as explained in the standards:
The update [Standards] were written with a trauma-aware lens; were imbued with the principles of reproductive justice, racial justice, social justice and equity; address the social determinants of health and how they can lead to inequitable health outcomes; and adopt an intersectional approach. This edition uses less cis and heteronormative language that reflects a wider range of relationships and identities.
The new standards have entire sections in their âGuiding Principlesâ section devoted to âSocial, Racial and Reproductive Justice and Equityâ, âIntersectionalityâ and âLinguistic Inclusionâ. They boast that “the updated NSES (standards) draw attention to overt and covert discrimination”.
Disturbingly, the standards directly challenge parental authority: âNo one else is qualified to label or judge another person’s gender identity, including their sexual orientation or gender identity, and they are important that the language and terms that young people use to identify themselves are respected by the adults in their lives.
Compare the number of times the following terms appear in each version.
|2011 standards||2020 standards|
|boy||7||1 (in the context of “princess boys”)|
This is how Austin teaches this program
The fruits of this deranged ideology are manifested in the Austin Independent School District‘s curriculum, which is standards-based. Austin is very much into the left-wing gender and same-sex ideology.
In sixth grade, teachers should explain that “people [incorrectly] assume that people with penises are boys and people with vaginas are girls âand that students should not assume that boys can only have girlfriends and vice versa. Even in kindergarten, after describing the “scrotum” as “the sac of skin that hangs down under the penis,” teachers have to say, “Most of the time people born with this reproductive system are referred to as men or boys. “.
Sixth-graders are also encouraged to attend an LGBT rally, âwrite ways to fight homophobiaâ and write a biography of a âprominent LGBT figure in contemporary historyâ. Also in grade six, students learn that assuming boys don’t wear dresses is a âstereotypeâ.
In this same lesson, students must find solutions for a girl who wants to date her homophobic mother. In another story, a child and his mother are both happy that her husband divorced and married a man instead.
In a video shown to eighth grade students in Austin, a puppet laments that people are complaining about him “about their homophobic father or racist grandmother” instead of correcting them. In the seventh grade, the term “fondling” is described as “manipulation of the genitals with the hand” with assurances of its legality. The same lesson discourages child rearing by claiming that a child will cost $ 233,610 until the age of 18.
Eighth grade students see an amaze.org video titled âHow to Talk to Boys, Girls, and Everyone in Betweenâ. In another animated puberty video, two animated breasts suddenly emerge to fill half of the screen, followed by the opening of several large bananas purported to represent penises, topped by an animated busty woman in a swimsuit. very revealing bath. Another lesson, designed for eighth grade children, implicitly encourages anal and oral sex by asserting that the only way to avoid pregnancy is “no sex with the penis in the vagina” and that contracting an STD is no longer possible. ‘is’ nothing to be embarrassed about’.
A sixth grade class says that touching breasts or genitals âinside the clothesâ âmayâ be considered abstinence. The same class contains a set of cards asking whether various acts, such as “oral sex (mouth to genitals)”, “anal sex (penis to anus)” and “touching breasts (inside clothes)” are considered abstinence.
One grade seven class defines abstinence as anything but âsemen in the vagina,â implying that those who have oral and anal sex can be considered abstinent. In that same classroom, disturbing graphics from the CDC show how to put on a condom, despite a warning from the CDC itself warning that “this material contains sexually graphic images and may not be suitable for certain audiences.”
A lesson on sexually transmitted infections in grade six contains many graphical hypothetical scenarios. The following is typical: âJamie and Jake are planning to have sex for the first time and plan to do it on the night of a party at their friends’ houseâ or âSix months ago Jonas was at a party and had drunk too much [and] ended up having unprotected sex.
In the same class, students are asked to consider the risk of âfrequent and accidental sex with unknown partnersâ or âsex, without a condom, with a partner you do not know wellâ, among other questions. Another eighth grade class is preparing a dose for the morning-after abortion pill.
It is a widespread debasement of sex and the creation of new life by filling the minds of children in public schools with sordid sexual images. He interprets humans as animals functioning by pure instinct.
For parents, there is nothing more disturbing than learning that their right to teach their children about sexuality, and the great responsibilities that go with it, are being violated by public schools. This must be stopped from spreading nationwide like its predecessor.
How to deal with this evil
Nothing has exploded on the state and national scene like the Counter-Response to Critical Race Theory (CRT), the idea that power in society is being put in place for the benefit of the white race. Because so many students were homeschooled during the pandemic, parents saw firsthand their hateful and propaganda-laden educational materials. This made K-12 education fertile ground for reform, and anti-CRT activists took advantage of it.
Since so many metropolitan areas have become so left-wing, it’s very difficult to enact changes in places like Austin. However, anti-CRT activists have found a new way to achieve their goal – through statewide actions by alarmed lawmakers, governors and appointed officials. This has happened with considerable speed so far. Legislation aimed at ending this harmful racial indoctrination has been passed in many states.
A similar statewide strategy should be followed to address the epidemic of sexual indoctrination in public schools. Legislation to eliminate this sexual horror show should be submitted to state legislatures and signed by governors. This should ensure that schools define family as a man, woman and children, prohibit discussions of sexual matters until at least ninth grade, and prohibit sex or pronoun changes.
While the CRT teaches hatred on the basis of skin color, the left-wing sexual ideology teaches hatred of one’s own body and hatred of parents who believe in the truth of the body given by God to their child. Not wanting your child to see pornographic images in college; not wanting her children to be brainwashed into believing that they have the power to change their gender and mutilate their healthy bodies; not wanting her kids to be dragged into the details of anal and oral sex in school – none of these are the exclusive project of religious conservatives. All of them will inspire cross-cutting ideological support capable of leading a grassroots movement.
Fighting the left in its program of radical sexuality is at most evoked by the Republican candidates. But once parents are fully awakened to the dangerous sexualization of children starting in kindergarten, they will be just as horrified as they were by CRT.
Before the closures, more than 80% of American children attended public schools. Considering the huge number of districts that have adopted the 2011 standards and the push by the radical left to overturn those that do not fully bend the knee to their agenda, the adoption by states of the new standards is inevitable in the process. lack of a massive fight to end the sexualization of schoolchildren.
Nick Bell was deputy director of the Center for Faith and Opportunity Initiatives at the Department of Education during the Trump administration.